This May, USAP (USA Pickleball Association) de-certified Joola’s high-profile Gen 3 paddles from its approved list. As the manufacturer countered with statements of “administrative error,” pickleball’s hot paddle controversies continued to simmer beneath the surface.

Pickleball’s rapid rise from a casual backyard game to a professional sport has been nothing short of spectacular. As the game’s popularity explodes, paddle manufacturers have rushed to capitalize on the growing market, vying for endorsements from top players and pushing the boundaries of design. While paddle innovation has undoubtedly fueled excitement, it has also opened the door to a series of controversies around hot paddles. From accusations of cheating and favoritism to questions about fair play and enforcement of equipment regulations, professional pickleball is facing increasing scrutiny and skepticism.

Here’s a brief overview of the situation.

What is a Hot Paddle and Why the Fuss?

A “hot” paddle is one that someone has modified or a manufacturer has made to exceed the legal limits set by governing bodies such as the USA Pickleball Association (USAP). These modifications can include:

Extra Grit/Surface Roughness

The USAP limits surface roughness to specific measurements to prevent excessive spin. Officials have suspected some sponsored players of modifying paddles to increase grit, which can give them an unfair advantage in match situations. Whether players can modify paddles without manufacturers’ support is open to speculation.

Delamination

This occurs when the paddle’s layers separate (either naturally or intentionally), creating a springboard effect that increases power. There’s no standardized test for delamination, and enforcement varies across different tours and organizations. People generally consider delamination illegal due to the performance-enhancing “trampoline effect” it creates.  Many club-level players may not even realize their paddles have delaminated. If your paddle generates more power than it used to, it’s perhaps time to give it a once over.

Flexible Cores

The USAP requires paddle cores to be made of non-compressible material to maintain consistency in play. Some newer paddles utilize cores that appear to compress upon impact, providing players extra power, potentially violating rules against non-compressible materials.

Paddle Deflection

Paddles must meet specific deflection limits to ensure a consistent bounce and prevent overly powerful shots. The testing methods, timing, and acceptable thresholds for deflection can vary between organizations, leading to inconsistencies and potential for exploitation. Paddles that exceed deflection limits can generate excessive power, making it difficult for opponents to defend.

Why would anyone risk using a hot paddle? 

The answer is simple: Gain an unfair advantage. These modifications can make a significant difference in a player’s performance, potentially leading to more wins and prize money.

Paddle Standards and Loopholes

The USA Pickleball Association (USAP) is the official rule-maker, setting standards for paddles, primarily focusing on surface grit and materials. But as the game evolved, so did the paddles, often pushing the boundaries of legality.

Controversies and Dubious Sponsorships

The pro pickleball scene has had its share of controversies, with high-profile players and manufacturers at the center.

In 2022, CRBN paddles were recalled due to non-conformity issues, causing a major disruption for sponsored players. The 2023 PPA Red Rock tournament saw its share of illegal paddle accusations and challenges with at least one high-profile player admitting that he had inadvertently used a laminated paddle for part of a tournament. A quick search for pickleball’s hot paddle controversies will give you a synopsis of recent accusations and recriminations that have attracted media attention.

Inconsistent Enforcement

The inconsistencies between different tours and organizations like the PPA and MLP have fueled mistrust among players. Paddles deemed illegal in one tour were allowed in another, raising serious questions about fairness. It would appear that professional pickleball organizations are not immune to external  (read manufacturer) influence. If reports are to be believed, the PPA reportedly lowered its deflection threshold mid-tournament after pressure from an “external party.” Reducing the number of failed paddles by lowering the standards would be akin to making the goal post bigger so players can score goals!

Should You Care?

For pickleball players constantly looking for ways to improve their game, a good paddle is a basic requirement. If your paddle-buying decision is based on what the pros use, it is important that you can trust what you are getting. If two players use the same make and model of a paddle brand, but one is tweaked, it makes for an uneven playing field. The integrity of the sport comes into question.

If you feel that your paddle is generating more power than it used to, it’s perhaps time to give it a once over.

What’s Next?

As pickleball continues to grow, it’s crucial for governing bodies to establish clear and consistent standards for paddle technology and apply the rules uniformly, irrespective of player standings. The controversies surrounding paddles may seem like a setback, but they also present an opportunity for the sport to evolve and become more transparent. Beyond the recreational aspect of the game, pickleball should truly be a game of skill, strategy, and competition.